[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Update ja-ptex for teTeX3
- Subject: Re: Update ja-ptex for teTeX3
- From: Kouichirou Hiratsuka <hira@po6.nsk.ne.jp>
- To: Min Sik Kim <minskim@NetBSD.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 02:19:53 +0900
- Message-ID: <m2mzdlvo3q.wl%hira@po6.nsk.ne.jp>
- In-Reply-To: <16A6720E-EEBC-458A-B9EB-5F580C4E2837@NetBSD.org>
- References: <m2bqu4acaj.wl%hira@po6.nsk.ne.jp><16A6720E-EEBC-458A-B9EB-5F580C4E2837@NetBSD.org>
- Cc: tech-pkg-ja@jp.NetBSD.org
- Delivered-To: mailing list tech-pkg-ja@jp.netbsd.org
- Mailing-List: contact tech-pkg-ja-help@jp.netbsd.org; run by ezmlm-idx
- User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.50 (i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.19) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Hello,
At Thu, 11 May 2006 23:53:11 -0700,
Min Sik Kim wrote:
> I noticed that you combined the ptex's texmf tree with that of teTeX
> (share/texmf-local). I've never used ptex, so this could be a stupid
> question: does any of files installed by ptex useful for teTeX
> commands (e.g., latex, dvips, etc.)? It seems that ptex has its own
> corresponding commands such as platex, and pdvips. If teTeX commands
> don't use files installed by ptex, I think we should keep a separate
> texmf tree for ptex only.
I think the ptex installed files are not useful for teTeX commands.
However, to my understanding share/texmf-local is texmf tree for TeX
packages. Is this incorrect?
best regards.
--
Kouichirou Hiratsuka
hira@po6.nsk.ne.jp