Hello, At Sat, 13 May 2006 11:09:47 -0700, Min Sik Kim wrote: > > [1 <text/plain; US-ASCII (7bit)>] > On May 13, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Kouichirou Hiratsuka wrote: > > > > However, to my understanding share/texmf-local is texmf tree for TeX > > packages. Is this incorrect? > > For a TeX implementation that tex.buildlink3.mk is aware of, yes. It > is not so clear for ptex since it maybe considered as another TeX > implementation with its own TeX and LaTeX commands. > > I don't have a strong opinion on this. So either having a separate > texmf tree for ptex or sharing the texmf tree with teTeX is fine with > me. I prefer sharing the tree. > But if we take the latter, there are a few rules that it must > follow, e.g., including print/teTeX/module.mk, using > PKG_LOCALTEXMFPREFIX instead of hardcoding texmf-local, honoring TDS, > etc. To follow the rules, I've created the patch again (ja-ptex-share and texmf-dirs are based on yours). best regards. -- Kouichirou Hiratsuka hira@po6.nsk.ne.jp
ja-ptex-teTeX3-20060516.patch.gz